Da Vinci Code.( what was it supposed to mean)

Dan Brown tried to create a conspiracy theory. But in the end I didnt like it at all. It didnt have the amount of suspense it claimed to have. Well according to one of the reviewers "If this doesnt get your pulse racing you dont need a doctor" Well the fact is that I felt that it was really not that good.
Meaning only good part of the book was that I could get an outline of Paris. Nothing more. The puzzles he put there were actually not that complex. Ok will agree that it was made someone dying. But the end was simply an anticlimax. Whole thing didnt seem to fit completely. Ofcourse the reason of success is the scale of its claims of duplications by the church.
Well i wouldnt recommend this to anybody for a start. Only thing is it is informative. Ofcourse what the guy says about Da Vincis Paintings are true. Thats about the last supper and Maddona of the rocks.

Guys if any of you have heard about "Salmon of Doubt" by DNA Do tell me.